Embedded Files
A SAFER, CLEANER, GREENER WAY TO SANITIZE HANDS AT YOUR WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
A SAFER, CLEANER, GREENER WAY TO SANITIZE HANDS AT YOUR WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
Features:
Features:
- Patent pending American designed.
- State of the art long-life 4000+ hour patent pending American Scientist designed excimer bulb producing 221.74 ± .1 nm light at 2000uW/cm2 at 4 inches.
- 8+ hours normal operational use for battery operated model, extended use batteries available.
- Instant on, instant off, motion sensor activated.
- High-Intensity output for extremely fast sanitization of hands, cell phone, keys, etc.
- Portable versatile patent pending American design.
Background:
Far-UVC light in the range between 207 - 222 nm has been evidenced to be safe for use around humans and efficiently kill pathogens such as Coronavirus or MERSA. 222nm light cannot penetrate even the outermost (non-living) layers of human skin or eye; however, because bacteria and viruses are of micrometer or smaller dimensions, 222nm far-UVC has been shown to penetrate and inactivate the pathogens.
Background:
Far-UVC light in the range between 207 - 222 nm has been evidenced to be safe for use around humans and efficiently kill pathogens such as Coronavirus or MERSA. 222nm light cannot penetrate even the outermost (non-living) layers of human skin or eye; however, because bacteria and viruses are of micrometer or smaller dimensions, 222nm far-UVC has been shown to penetrate and inactivate the pathogens.
Does UV 222nm work and is it safe? (YES!)
Does UV 222nm work and is it safe? (YES!)
“…far-UVC light in the range of 200–222 nm kills bacteria efficiently regardless of their drug-resistant proficiency, but without the skin damaging effects associated with conventional germicidal UV exposure.”
“…far-UVC light in the range of 200–222 nm kills bacteria efficiently regardless of their drug-resistant proficiency, but without the skin damaging effects associated with conventional germicidal UV exposure.”
“…222 nm is essentially equi-effective at killing antibiotic-resistant bacteria as conventional germicidal UV lamps (254 nm).”
“…222 nm is essentially equi-effective at killing antibiotic-resistant bacteria as conventional germicidal UV lamps (254 nm).”
“…UV light at 222nm has the same germicidal capabilities of 254nm light with out damaging skin or eyes. The studies suggest that this may be due to the shorter UV 222nm wavelength (known as Far-UV, 200 to 235 nm) having reduced penetration depths in live tissue when compared with 254 nm light. While the effects on live tissue are diminished, Far-UV (222 nm light being the most prevalent) has increased efficacy for killing bacteria and viruses.“
“…UV light at 222nm has the same germicidal capabilities of 254nm light with out damaging skin or eyes. The studies suggest that this may be due to the shorter UV 222nm wavelength (known as Far-UV, 200 to 235 nm) having reduced penetration depths in live tissue when compared with 254 nm light. While the effects on live tissue are diminished, Far-UV (222 nm light being the most prevalent) has increased efficacy for killing bacteria and viruses.“
“Far-UV 222 nm is safer and more effective than the existing 250 to 280 nm UVC systems, with advantages that include reduced UV damage to skin and eyes, faster on/off times, more rapid disinfection, and the elimination of mercury from the lamp.”
“Far-UV 222 nm is safer and more effective than the existing 250 to 280 nm UVC systems, with advantages that include reduced UV damage to skin and eyes, faster on/off times, more rapid disinfection, and the elimination of mercury from the lamp.”
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse